August 21
- ASaunders
- Aug 21, 2025
- 14 min read

After the Fall: Choosing Whose Voice to Follow
Jeremiah 41-45 records the turbulent aftermath of Jerusalem’s destruction. Instead of turning back to the Lord in repentance, the remnant in Judah is swept into more tragedy through political assassinations, fear, and rebellion. Chapter 41 describes Ishmael’s violent plot, which deepens instability among the survivors. In chapters 42–43, the people approach Jeremiah asking for God’s guidance, but when the word of the Lord contradicts their desires, they refuse to listen and drag Jeremiah with them into Egypt. Chapter 44 exposes their continued idolatry as they openly declare allegiance to the “queen of heaven,” rejecting God’s warnings. Finally, chapter 45 offers a personal word of comfort to Baruch, Jeremiah’s faithful scribe, reminding him that though the nation is falling, God sees and preserves individuals who remain faithful.
Jeremiah 41 – The Murder of Gedaliah and the Flight to Egypt Begins
After the fall of Jerusalem and the deportation of many Judeans, Nebuchadnezzar appointed Gedaliah, son of Ahikam, as governor over the remnant in Judah (Jeremiah 40:5). Chapter 41 recounts the tragic aftermath of this arrangement. In the seventh month, Ishmael, son of Nethaniah, a man of royal blood and one of the military leaders, came to Gedaliah at Mizpah with ten men (v. 1). Gedaliah had welcomed them with hospitality, eating a meal together, a gesture that in the ancient Near Eastern context symbolized peace and loyalty. Yet Ishmael betrayed this trust. Rising up during the meal, he and his men struck down Gedaliah with the sword, killing not only the governor but also those Chaldean soldiers stationed with him (v. 2-3). This act was not only treachery against Gedaliah but rebellion against Babylon’s authority, undermining the fragile peace left in the land.
The violence continued the next day. Before word of Gedaliah’s death had spread, eighty men arrived from Shechem, Shiloh, and Samaria, bringing grain offerings and incense to the house of the Lord (v. 4-5). These men were probably pilgrims for one of the three feasts held during the seventh month (Lev. 23:23-44), as they were from three Israelite cities that had been part of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. The fact that these men were from the Northern Kingdom implies that at least some of King Josiah’s reforms (2 Kings 23:15-20; 2 Chron. 34:33) had a lasting impact. The men were in mourning, with their beards shaved and clothes torn as a sign of grief for the devastation of the temple. Though the temple had been destroyed, people still worshiped at its site.
Under the guise of offering safe passage to Gedaliah (whom he has just killed), Ishmael deceitfully went out weeping to meet the pilgrims, as though he shared in their sorrow (v. 6). Once inside the city, however, Ishmael and his men slaughtered seventy of them, casting their bodies into a cistern (v. 7). Ishmael likely killed the mourners either for their provisions or to silence them, fearing they would expose his earlier crimes. Without a king, with no law and no loyalty to God, Judah was subjected to complete anarchy. Ishmael spared 10 men, not out of mercy, but because they promised him hidden supplies of food, including wheat, barley, oil, and honey (v. 8).
It is understood that Ishmael carried out these crimes because Baalis, king of the Ammonites, had hired him (Jeremiah 40:14). As a descendant of David and the royal line, Ishmael was likely jealous that Gedaliah, rather than himself, had been appointed governor, which made him more willing to carry out the Ammonite king’s plot. Ishmael’s treachery was especially shocking because he had lived through the fall of Jerusalem and Judah, yet still did not fear or honor the Lord. This detail highlights Ishmael’s self-interest and disregard for God’s people, turning an act of mourning and worship into an opportunity for violence and gain.
Jeremiah further notes that the cistern used for the bodies had originally been dug by King Asa as part of defensive preparations against Baasha of Israel (v. 9; 1 Kings 15:22). This grim historical reminder emphasizes how a structure meant for protection was turned into a mass grave, underscoring the tragic reversal of Judah’s fortunes. Ishmael then carried away captives remaining in Mizpah, including women, children, and royal princesses entrusted to Gedaliah’s care, along with others still living in the city (v. 10). He began leading them away, presumably to cross over to the Ammonites, with whom he was allied (Jeremiah 40:14).
However, Ishmael’s schemes did not go unchecked. When Johanan son of Kareah and the other commanders who had earlier warned Gedaliah about Ishmael’s plot heard of the massacre, they gathered their forces and pursued him (v. 11-12). They caught up with him at the great pool in Gibeon. At the sight of Johanan and his men, the captives that Ishmael was carrying turned and rejoiced, breaking away to join their rescuers (v. 13-14). Ishmael himself escaped with eight men, fleeing to the Ammonites for refuge (v. 15). Thus, while the immediate crisis was partly contained, the damage done by Ishmael’s treachery was devastating, leaving Judah’s fragile community even more fractured.
Johanan then gathered all the survivors, including men, women, children, and soldiers rescued from Ishmael, and began to lead them away (v. 16). Out of fear of Babylon’s retribution for Gedaliah’s murder and the killing of the Babylonian soldiers, they set out toward Egypt for safety (v. 17). They stopped at Geruth Chimham near Bethlehem, still uncertain but leaning toward exile in Egypt (v. 18).
Jeremiah 41 illustrates the dangers of misplaced trust and unchecked rebellion. Gedaliah’s kindness and openness, though commendable in spirit, left him vulnerable to treachery when he ignored repeated warnings about Ishmael. His downfall shows the importance of discerning leadership and heeding wise counsel. Ishmael, by contrast, embodies selfish ambition and violence, willing to slaughter fellow Jews and desecrate worshipers on their way to the temple in pursuit of political gain. His actions not only betrayed human trust but also desecrated the sacred, reflecting the depths of covenantal unfaithfulness.
Jeremiah 42 – Seeking Guidance but Rejecting God’s Word
After rescuing the captives from Ishmael and gathering them at Geruth Chimham near Bethlehem (Jeremiah 41:16-18), Johanan son of Kareah, the other army leaders, and all the people, from the least to the greatest, approached Jeremiah the prophet to seek divine direction (Jeremiah 42:1-2). They admitted their vulnerability, acknowledging themselves as only a small remnant left after Judah’s devastation. Their request was simple: Jeremiah should pray to the Lord on their behalf, that He might show them the right way to walk and the right thing to do (v. 2-3).
Jeremiah responded with a promise of faithfulness. He assured them that he would indeed pray to the Lord and that he would tell them everything God revealed without withholding a single word (v. 4). In return, the people swore a solemn oath: they would obey whatever the Lord commanded, whether pleasant or difficult, for they recognized their responsibility to follow His word for their own well-being (v. 5-6). Their words sounded sincere, but as the narrative later shows, their obedience was conditional, shaped by fear and self-interest rather than genuine trust.
Ten days passed before the Lord gave His answer, a delay that tested their patience and revealed the seriousness of God’s message (v. 7). When the word came, Jeremiah gathered Johanan, the military leaders, and all the people (v. 8) and delivered the Lord’s instruction in detail. The message was clear: if they remained in the land of Judah, God would build them up and plant them, not tear them down or uproot them (v. 9-10). He promised to relent from His anger and assured them they had no reason to fear the king of Babylon. Instead, He would protect them, deliver them, and show them compassion, even causing Nebuchadnezzar to treat them with mercy (v. 11-12). In other words, God’s path to safety was staying in the land, trusting His sovereignty, and not giving in to fear.
However, the Lord also warned them of the danger of disobedience. If they set their hearts on fleeing to Egypt, thinking they would find safety from war, famine, and want, then the very disasters they feared would overtake them there (v. 13-16). War, famine, and pestilence, the covenant curses, would pursue them, and none of them would survive (v. 17). Egypt would not be a refuge but a graveyard. God pressed the seriousness of this decision, reminding them that He had sent Jeremiah to warn them not to go to Egypt (v. 18-19).
Jeremiah ended with a sober warning: if they disobeyed and chose Egypt, they would face the very judgments they sought to avoid (v. 20-22). Though they had promised obedience, their hearts were already set against the Lord’s direction.
Jeremiah 42 exposes the tension between professed obedience and genuine submission to God’s word. The remnant asked Jeremiah to seek the Lord’s guidance and vowed to obey whatever He said, yet their hearts were already set on Egypt. This reveals the danger of self-deception and seeking divine approval for our own plans rather than true surrender. Jeremiah warned them plainly: God had forbidden their flight to Egypt, and if they disobeyed, they would face sword, famine, and plague.
God’s message carried both assurance and warning. His promise of protection if they remained in Judah shows His desire to bless and restore His people even after judgment. At the same time, His warning against Egypt underscores that worldly refuge apart from God leads to destruction. True safety lies in trustful obedience, even when circumstances seem threatening, whereas human reliance, symbolized by Egypt, ultimately fails.
For today’s believers, the chapter challenges us to examine our motives when seeking God’s guidance. Do we genuinely desire His will, or do we ask Him to bless our predetermined plans? It also reminds us that God’s delays, like the ten-day wait Jeremiah experienced, are not signs of neglect but part of His sovereign wisdom. Patience, trust, and wholehearted submission are marks of true faith, while fear-driven disobedience leads only to loss.
Jeremiah 43 – Rebellion and Flight to Egypt
After Jeremiah delivered God’s clear warning not to go down to Egypt, the people revealed the true state of their hearts. Azariah, son of Hoshaiah, Johanan, son of Kareah, and other proud men accused Jeremiah of lying (verse 2). They insisted that the prophet’s message was not from the Lord, but a scheme devised by Baruch, son of Neriah, to hand them over to the Babylonians (v. 3). This accusation exposed both unbelief and paranoia; they viewed God’s word as a trap rather than a safeguard. Their oaths of obedience in Jeremiah 42:5-6 were now shown to be hollow, and their distrust of Jeremiah and Baruch reflected a deeper rejection of God Himself.
Despite the divine warning, Johanan, the army officers, and all the people disobeyed. They took the entire remnant, including men, women, children, the king’s daughters, and even Jeremiah and Baruch, down to Egypt (v. 4-7). This act of rebellion was tragic: those who had once asked the prophet to intercede for them now dragged him with them into disobedience. The irony is striking: the prophet of God, who had faithfully warned them, became a prisoner among his own people as they rejected the very word he proclaimed. They arrived at Tahpanhes, an important Egyptian city near the Nile Delta, symbolizing their full embrace of what God had forbidden.
At Tahpanhes, God gave Jeremiah a symbolic act to perform. He was instructed to take large stones and bury them in clay in the pavement at the entrance of Pharaoh’s palace (v. 8-9). This prophetic sign declared that Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, would one day set his throne upon those very stones. Egypt, which the remnant thought would provide safety, would itself fall under Babylon’s power. The Lord announced that Nebuchadnezzar would come and strike Egypt, destroying its land, carrying off its gods, and burning its temples (v. 10-13). Thus, Egypt would not be a refuge but another place of judgment, proving God’s earlier warnings true.
Jeremiah 43 highlights the danger of pride and unbelief. The remnant’s refusal to trust God’s word shows how rebellion often disguises itself with excuses such as blaming the messenger, questioning motives, and rationalizing disobedience. Their decision to flee to Egypt, despite explicit warnings, illustrates the tendency to seek worldly security rather than relying on God’s promises. What they thought would preserve their lives ultimately brought them into greater danger, fulfilling the covenant curses of war, famine, and pestilence.
The chapter also reveals the faithfulness of God’s word through symbolic prophecy. Jeremiah’s act of burying stones at Tahpanhes visually confirmed that Babylon’s power extended even into Egypt. No place of refuge exists outside of God’s will. Egypt, representing human strength and misplaced trust, could not protect them. In this, the chapter points forward to a gospel truth: true security is not found in fleeing to earthly strongholds but in trusting the Lord Himself.
For believers today, Jeremiah 43 serves as a warning against selective obedience—promising faithfulness while secretly resisting God’s commands. It challenges us to examine whether we truly seek His will or simply look for divine approval of our own desires. The people’s rejection of Jeremiah reminds us that resisting God’s messengers is ultimately resisting God. The call is clear: obedience, even when difficult, is the only path to life and blessing.
Jeremiah 44 – Judgment on Idolatry in Egypt
Once in Egypt, Jeremiah delivered one of his most sobering and confrontational prophecies. The Lord’s word came to him for all the Judean remnant living in Pathros, Migdol, Tahpanhes, and Memphis (v. 1). These were key Egyptian settlements, showing that the disobedient community was spreading throughout the land. Jeremiah reminded them of the devastating judgment that had fallen upon Jerusalem and Judah because of persistent idolatry (v. 2-6). Cities lay in ruins and desolate “as at this day” (v. 6), not because of political misfortune, but because the people had provoked the Lord by burning incense to other gods and forsaking His covenant.
Jeremiah then confronted their hypocrisy. God had sent prophets to warn them not to worship false gods (v. 4), yet they did not listen. Instead of learning from Judah’s destruction, they were repeating the very sins that caused it. By turning again to idolatry in Egypt, they were bringing disaster upon themselves (v. 7-10). Jeremiah declared that the Lord had determined to cut off the remnant of Judah in Egypt, so that none would return except a very small number (v. 11-14). The very hope of survival that had driven them to Egypt would be lost through sword, famine, and pestilence, just as God had warned earlier (v. 15-17).
In one of the most shocking exchanges in the book, the people flatly rejected Jeremiah’s message. Both men and women boldly insisted they would not listen to him, but would continue to burn incense to the “queen of heaven” (v. 15-17). They claimed that when they worshiped her in Judah, they had enjoyed prosperity and plenty, but since ceasing, they had suffered hardship (v. 18). This false interpretation of history revealed a heart hardened against truth: they credited blessing to idols rather than to the Lord. The women added that their husbands knew and approved of their idolatry, making it a household rebellion against God (v. 19).
Jeremiah responded with firmness, declaring that the Lord was indeed aware of their vows and idol worship (v. 20-22). Far from bringing blessings, their devotion to the queen of heaven was the very reason for Judah’s downfall. Because they persisted, the Lord swore by His great name that none of them would invoke His name in Egypt any longer (v. 26). Instead, they would face destruction, with only a few survivors ever returning to Judah (v. 27-28). To confirm His word, God gave them a sign: Pharaoh Hophra, king of Egypt, would be handed over to his enemies just as Zedekiah had been given to Nebuchadnezzar (v. 29-30). The overthrow of Egypt’s ruler would prove that the Lord’s judgment was certain.
Jeremiah 44 reveals the depth of human rebellion. Even after witnessing the destruction of Jerusalem and hearing God’s warnings repeatedly, the remnant defiantly clung to their idols. Their misplaced nostalgia, believing they prospered when serving the “queen of heaven,” shows how sin distorts memory and blinds the heart. Instead of recognizing that blessing comes from obedience to God, they attributed prosperity to false gods. This reveals a timeless danger: people often misinterpret success or hardship as proof of their own choices rather than as part of God’s covenant dealings.
The chapter also underscores God’s jealousy for His people and HIs sovereignty. He will not share His glory with another (Isaiah 42:8). The remnant’s attempt to blend worship of Yahweh with devotion to other gods was not tolerated. Just as they swore loyalty to idols, God swore by His great name that His people in Egypt would be judged. His covenant faithfulness meant that disobedience had to be addressed with discipline.
For believers today, Jeremiah 44 serves as a warning against stubborn hearts that refuse correction. It is possible to hear God’s Word repeatedly yet choose to rationalize disobedience, blame circumstances, or rewrite history to justify sin. It also reminds us that idolatry is not just about statues but about misplaced trust, whether in wealth, success, relationships, or personal desires. The remnant sought security in Egypt and blessing from the queen of heaven, but in the end, only judgment awaited.
Ultimately, the passage calls Christians to wholehearted devotion. God’s people cannot serve two masters (Matthew 6:24). True life, blessing, and hope are found only in Him.
Jeremiah 45 – A Word to Baruch
This short chapter is often overlooked, yet it carries profound encouragement and correction. It dates to the fourth year of King Jehoiakim of Judah (605-604 B.C.), the same year Baruch had recorded on a scroll the message Jeremiah was then dictating (36:1-8). While Jeremiah had been addressing the fate of the nation, in chapter 45, the Lord speaks directly to Baruch, showing that even in the midst of sweeping judgment, God cares for the struggles of individual servants.
Evidently, Baruch was discouraged because of the content of the message. He lamented, “Woe is me! For the Lord has added sorrow to my pain. I am weary with my groaning, and I find no rest” (v. 3). This personal cry reveals the toll of ministry: Baruch had not only endured the rejection and hostility directed at Jeremiah but had also shared in the burden of recording, proclaiming, and preserving the prophetic word.
God’s response in verses 4-5 is striking. He reminds Baruch of His sovereign work: “Behold, what I have built I am breaking down, and what I have planted I am plucking up—that is, the whole land” (v. 4). In other words, the scale of God’s judgment on Judah was so great that Baruch’s personal ambitions could not be prioritized. The Lord asked him directly, “Do you seek great things for yourself? Seek them not” (v. 5a). This was not a rebuke of Baruch’s faithfulness but of his desire for personal advancement or ease in a time when God’s agenda was judgment. Baruch was reminded that his calling was not to pursue personal success but to remain faithful in serving God’s Word, regardless of circumstances.
Yet the passage ends with a promise of grace. God assures Baruch that although He is bringing disaster on the whole land, Baruch’s life would be spared “as a prize of war in all places to which you may go” (v. 5b). This phrase echoes the promises made earlier to Jeremiah himself. While Baruch could not expect wealth, honor, or comfort, he could rest in the Lord’s protection. His reward would not be worldly recognition but life preserved by God’s hand.
Jeremiah 45 highlights God’s concern for the individual amid national crisis. While the book largely deals with judgment on Judah, this chapter reminds us that the Lord does not overlook the struggles of His servants. He speaks to Baruch’s weariness with both correction and comfort, redirecting his perspective from self-ambition to God’s larger plan.
Baruch had faithfully served this unpopular prophet by recording God’s messages of struggle and judgment. Naturally, he felt discouraged. God reminded Baruch to stop focusing on himself and any rewards he thought he deserved, promising His protection if he did. When we shift our attention from God to our own sacrifices or expectations, it is easy to lose the joy of serving Him. Frustration grows when we dwell on what we give up rather than the privilege of obedience. In those moments, we should confess our self-focus to God and reorient our hearts toward the incomparable honor of serving Him.
Baruch’s struggle also reflects the reality of ministry fatigue. Even faithful servants can grow weary and disheartened when their expectations do not match reality. God’s answer is not to minimize the difficulty but to provide perspective: His purposes are larger, His judgment is just, and His preservation is sure.
In this way, Jeremiah 45 becomes a timeless encouragement. It calls believers to align their ambitions with God’s purposes, to endure hardship with trust, and to find comfort in His promise of life.
Conclusion
These chapters highlight the critical choice every generation faces: whose voice will we follow? Judah’s remnant outwardly sought God’s direction but ultimately followed their fears and stubborn hearts, leading to further judgment. Yet God’s care for Baruch reminds us that He notices personal faithfulness, even when the larger community rebels. Jeremiah 41-45 challenges us to examine whether we truly seek God’s will with surrendered hearts, or if we only listen when His word aligns with our plans. In every age, life and blessing are found in trusting His voice above all others.


Comments